GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB comes out marginally faster — about 7% ahead of the Arc A770. But the Arc A770 is the better value, undercutting it by $149 USD for the performance you get.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs Arc A770: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs Arc A770
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is marginally faster, around 7% ahead of the Arc A770. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to 1440p.
Price & Value
The Arc A770 currently lists from $300 USD, $149 USD less than the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB at $449 USD. Despite being slower, the Arc A770 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~40% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Arc A770 is trading below its $329 USD MSRP — a genuine deal. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB still sits about $100 USD above its $349 USD MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 160W against 225W, the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern RDNA 4 architecture on a TSMC N4 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
Generation & Longevity
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is roughly 3 years newer than the Arc A770 (RDNA 4 vs Alchemist), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A770 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A770 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB?
Choose the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A770 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.