GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster than the Arc A770, leading by roughly 100% in our performance index. The Arc A770, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $310 USD cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Arc A770: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Arc A770
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster, around 100% ahead of the Arc A770. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 6900 XT is comfortable at 1440p, while the Arc A770 is better matched to 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Arc A770 starts at $160 USD against $470 USD for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Despite being slower, the Arc A770 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~47% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Arc A770 is trading below its $329 USD MSRP — a genuine deal. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is trading below its $999 USD MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A770 pulls less power (225W vs 300W), so it's the easier card to cool and the lighter load on your PSU. The faster Radeon RX 6900 XT draws more overall but extracts more performance from each watt — plan for a sturdier power supply if you pick it.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A770 is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX 6900 XT (Alchemist vs RDNA 2), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A770 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A770 or Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Choose the Radeon RX 6900 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A770 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.