GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The Arc A750 is significantly faster than the Radeon RX Vega 64, leading by roughly 29% in our performance index. The Radeon RX Vega 64, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $80 USD cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Arc A750 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Arc A750 vs Radeon RX Vega 64
The Arc A750 is significantly faster, around 29% ahead of the Radeon RX Vega 64. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Radeon RX Vega 64 starts at $195 USD against $275 USD for the Arc A750. Despite being slower, the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~10% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is trading below its $499 USD MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A750 draws just 225W versus 295W for the Radeon RX Vega 64, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A750 is roughly 5 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 64 (Alchemist vs GCN 5.0 (Vega)), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A750 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A750 or Radeon RX Vega 64?
Choose the Arc A750 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Radeon RX Vega 64 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.