Arc A310 vs Geforce GTX 1050
On raw speed the Arc A310 comes out ahead: well ahead on speed, about 33% ahead of the Geforce GTX 1050. That said, the Geforce GTX 1050 is the smarter buy on value — $35 USD less for the performance on offer.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Arc A310 vs Geforce GTX 1050: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Arc A310 vs Geforce GTX 1050
The Arc A310 is significantly faster, around 33% ahead of the Geforce GTX 1050. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The Geforce GTX 1050 currently lists from $65 USD, $35 USD less than the Arc A310 at $100 USD. Despite being slower, the Geforce GTX 1050 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~15% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Geforce GTX 1050 is trading below its $109 USD MSRP — a genuine deal. The Arc A310 is trading below its $130 USD MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
At 30W against 75W, the Arc A310 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
VRAM favors the Arc A310 at 4GB versus 2GB on the Geforce GTX 1050 — that extra 2GB matters most at 4K, with high-res texture packs, and for content-creation/local-AI work.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A310 is roughly 6 years newer than the Geforce GTX 1050 (Alchemist vs Pascal), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Geforce GTX 1050 offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Geforce GTX 1050?
Choose the Arc A310 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Geforce GTX 1050 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Arc A310 better than the Geforce GTX 1050?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the Geforce GTX 1050?
Is the Arc A310 worth the extra $35 USD over the Geforce GTX 1050?
Does the Arc A310 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Geforce GTX 1050?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A310 | Geforce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Pascal |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | Samsung 14nm |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / CUDA Cores) | 768✓ | 640 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | — |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 96 | — |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A310 | Geforce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 1,354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 1,455 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A310 | Geforce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB✓ | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit | 128-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 15.5 Gbps✓ | 7 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 124 GB/s✓ | 112 GB/s |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A310 | Geforce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 30 W✓ | 75 W |
| Power Connectors | None | None |
| Released | Oct 2022 | Oct 2016 |
