GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is dramatically faster than the Arc A310, leading by roughly 500% in our performance index. The Arc A310, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $744 GBP cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Arc A310
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is dramatically faster, around 500% ahead of the Arc A310. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 6700 XT is comfortable at 1080p, while the Arc A310 is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Arc A310 starts at $124 GBP against $868 GBP for the Radeon RX 6700 XT. Despite being slower, the Arc A310 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~17% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon RX 6700 XT still sits about $389 GBP above its $479 GBP MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A310 draws just 30W versus 230W for the Radeon RX 6700 XT, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 12GB against 4GB, the Radeon RX 6700 XT has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the Arc A310's 4GB can fall short.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Radeon RX 6700 XT?
Choose the Radeon RX 6700 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A310 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.