GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Market Value Leader

Arc A310 is the clear winner, offering 128.3% better value than Radeon R9 390.

Quick Verdict

On raw speed the Radeon R9 390 comes out significantly faster — about 25% ahead of the Arc A310. But the Arc A310 is the better value, undercutting it by $1,385 AED for the performance you get.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
INTEL
Arc A310
Price
AED 747
Performance
4/100
VRAM
4 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage
+100% Boost Clock (2,000 MHz vs 1,000 MHz)
Price
AED 2,133
Performance
5/100
VRAM
8 GB GDDR5
Key Specs Advantage
+700% Memory Bus (512-bit vs 64-bit)
+233% Stream Processors (2,560 vs 768)
+210% Bandwidth (384 GB/s vs 124 GB/s)

Radeon R9 390 vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: Radeon R9 390 vs Arc A310

The Radeon R9 390 is significantly faster, around 25% ahead of the Arc A310. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.

Price & Value

The Arc A310 currently lists from $747 AED, $1,385 AED less than the Radeon R9 390 at $2,133 AED. Despite being slower, the Arc A310 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~128% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Arc A310 still sits about $617 AED above its $130 AED MSRP. The Radeon R9 390 still sits about $1,804 AED above its $329 AED MSRP.

Power & Efficiency

At 30W against 275W, the Arc A310 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.

VRAM & Future-Proofing

The Radeon R9 390 carries 8GB versus 4GB on the Arc A310. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.

Generation & Longevity

The Arc A310 is roughly 7 years newer than the Radeon R9 390 (Alchemist vs GCN 2.0), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.

Features & Ecosystem

Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon R9 390 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.

Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Radeon R9 390?

Choose the Radeon R9 390 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A310 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Radeon R9 390 better than the Arc A310?

The Radeon R9 390 is significantly faster, roughly 25% ahead. The Arc A310 is still worth it if value matters more than top-end frames.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the Radeon R9 390?

Neither is a dedicated 4K card; both are best at entry-level 1080p. For 4K you'd want a faster GPU, or lean on upscaling.

Is the Radeon R9 390 worth the extra $1,385 AED over the Arc A310?

Only if you need the extra performance or features; on pure value the Arc A310 comes out ahead.

Does the Radeon R9 390 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?

Its 8GB (vs 4GB) gives real headroom for 4K, heavy texture mods, and creative/AI work. At 1080p the gap matters less.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationArc A310Radeon R9 390
ArchitectureAlchemistGCN 2.0
Process NodeTSMC N6TSMC 28nm
CUDA Cores (Shading Units / Stream Processors)7682,560
Ray Tracing Cores6
Tensor / AI Cores96

Clock Speeds

SpecificationArc A310Radeon R9 390
Base Clock2,000 MHz1,000 MHz
Boost Clock2,000 MHz1,000 MHz

Memory

SpecificationArc A310Radeon R9 390
VRAM Capacity4 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bus64-bit512-bit
Memory Speed15.5 Gbps6 Gbps
Bandwidth124 GB/s384 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationArc A310Radeon R9 390
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
TDP30 W275 W
Power ConnectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
ReleasedOct 2022Jun 2015