GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the Radeon RX 7700 XT comes out dramatically faster — about 78% ahead of the Arc A750. But the Arc A750 is the better value, undercutting it by $391 EUR for the performance you get.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Arc A750: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Arc A750
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is dramatically faster, around 78% ahead of the Arc A750. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 7700 XT is comfortable at 1440p, while the Arc A750 is better matched to 1080p.
Price & Value
The Arc A750 currently lists from $58 EUR, $391 EUR less than the Radeon RX 7700 XT at $448 EUR. Despite being slower, the Arc A750 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~338% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Arc A750 is trading below its $289 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
On power, the Arc A750 is the gentler choice at 225W versus 245W. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is more efficient per watt because it's faster, but its higher 245W draw means more heat and a bigger PSU. Its more modern RDNA 3 architecture on a TSMC N5 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon RX 7700 XT carries 12GB versus 8GB on the Arc A750. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A750 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A750 or Radeon RX 7700 XT?
Choose the Radeon RX 7700 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A750 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.