GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Quick Verdict

The Arc A310 is significantly faster than the GeForce GTX 960, leading by roughly 33% in our performance index. It is also the stronger value pick here, so it's the easy recommendation if your budget allows.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
INTEL
Arc A310
Price
€137
Performance
4%
VRAM
4 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage
+70% Boost Clock (2,000 MHz vs 1,178 MHz)
+11% Bandwidth (124 GB/s vs 112 GB/s)
Price
€640
Performance
3%
VRAM
2 GB GDDR5
Key Specs Advantage
+100% Memory Bus (128-bit vs 64-bit)
+33% CUDA Cores (1,024 vs 768)

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 960: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 960

The Arc A310 is significantly faster, around 33% ahead of the GeForce GTX 960. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.

Price & Value

Right now the Arc A310 starts at $137 EUR against $640 EUR for the GeForce GTX 960. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Arc A310 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 522%. The GeForce GTX 960 still sits about $441 EUR above its $199 EUR MSRP.

Power & Efficiency

The Arc A310 draws just 30W versus 120W for the GeForce GTX 960, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.

VRAM & Future-Proofing

With 4GB against 2GB, the Arc A310 has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 960's 2GB can fall short.

Generation & Longevity

The Arc A310 is roughly 7 years newer than the GeForce GTX 960 (Alchemist vs Maxwell), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.

Features & Ecosystem

Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce GTX 960 offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.

Which should you buy: Arc A310 or GeForce GTX 960?

The Arc A310 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the GeForce GTX 960 if you find it at a steep discount.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Arc A310 better than the GeForce GTX 960?

The Arc A310 is significantly faster, roughly 33% ahead. If your budget allows, it's the stronger pick.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the GeForce GTX 960?

Neither is a dedicated 4K card; both are best at entry-level 1080p. For 4K you'd want a faster GPU, or lean on upscaling.

Is the GeForce GTX 960 worth the extra $503 EUR over the Arc A310?

Only if you need the extra performance or features; on pure value the Arc A310 comes out ahead.

Does the Arc A310 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?

Its 4GB (vs 2GB) gives real headroom for 4K, heavy texture mods, and creative/AI work. At 1080p the gap matters less.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationArc A310GeForce GTX 960
ArchitectureAlchemistMaxwell
Process NodeTSMC N6TSMC 28nm
CUDA Cores (Shading Units / CUDA Cores)7681,024
Ray Tracing Cores6
Tensor / AI Cores96

Clock Speeds

SpecificationArc A310GeForce GTX 960
Base Clock2,000 MHz1,127 MHz
Boost Clock2,000 MHz1,178 MHz

Memory

SpecificationArc A310GeForce GTX 960
VRAM Capacity4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bus64-bit128-bit
Memory Speed15.5 Gbps7 Gbps
Bandwidth124 GB/s112 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationArc A310GeForce GTX 960
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
TDP30 W120 W
Power ConnectorsNone1x 6-pin
ReleasedOct 2022Jan 2015