Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is a big jump in performance — leading the Arc A770 by roughly 30% in our performance index. It also comes out ahead on value, making it the straightforward pick if the price fits your budget.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB vs Arc A770: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB vs Arc A770
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is significantly faster, around 30% ahead of the Arc A770. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is comfortable at 1440p, while the Arc A770 is better matched to 1080p.
Price & Value
On price, expect to pay $331 EUR for the Arc A770 versus $411 EUR for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB wins on performance-per-dollar.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB draws just 160W versus 225W for the Arc A770, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Ada Lovelace architecture on a TSMC N4 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 16GB against 8GB, the Arc A770 has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB's 8GB can fall short.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A770 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A770 or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB?
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Arc A770 if you find it at a steep discount.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB better than the Arc A770?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A770 or the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB?
Is the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB worth the extra $80 EUR over the Arc A770?
Does the Arc A770 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: Arc A770 or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | TSMC N4 |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / CUDA Cores) | 4,096 | 4,352✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 34✓ |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 512✓ | 136 |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,100 MHz | 2,310 MHz✓ |
| Boost Clock | 2,400 MHz | 2,535 MHz✓ |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB✓ | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 256-bit✓ | 128-bit |
| Memory Speed | 17.5 Gbps | 18 Gbps✓ |
| Bandwidth | 560 GB/s✓ | 288 GB/s |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TDP | 225 W | 160 W✓ |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Released | Oct 2022 | May 2023 |
Related Reading
Intel Arc A770 in 2026: The Used-Market 16GB Card — What Still Works, and What Still Breaks
The A770 is discontinued Alchemist silicon with a 16GB frame buffer and a 256-bit bus. Four years of driver work fixed a lot — and left some things broken. An honest read on who should buy one used, and who absolutely should not.
How to Run Powerful Local LLMs on a Budget GPU in 2026
An 8GB GPU can now run near-flagship open models locally. Here's how QAT, MoE, llama.cpp offloading and MTP turn a budget PC into a private AI rig in 2026.
Intel Arc Alchemist in 2026: Is a Used A580, A750 or A770 Still Worth Buying?
Every Arc Alchemist card is discontinued, and Battlemage replaced them. So what does a used A580, A750 or A770 still buy you — and at what price does it beat a new Arc B580? An honest retrospective on Intel's first discrete GPUs.