GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Market Value Leader

Market comparison is currently pending while we verify the latest benchmarks for Arc A310 and Arc A750.

Quick Verdict

On raw speed the Arc A750 comes out dramatically faster — about 350% ahead of the Arc A310. It also wins on performance-per-dollar, making it the cleaner choice when you can afford it.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
Price
¥25,439
Performance
4/100
VRAM
4 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage

Comparable or lower specs

INTEL
Arc A750
Price
¥40,133
Performance
18/100
VRAM
8 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage
+367% Shading Units (3,584 vs 768)
+367% Ray Tracing Units (28 vs 6)
+367% XMX Engines (448 vs 96)

Arc A750 vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: Arc A750 vs Arc A310

The Arc A750 is dramatically faster, around 350% ahead of the Arc A310. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Arc A750 is comfortable at 1080p, while the Arc A310 is better matched to entry-level 1080p. The Arc A750 packs 3,584 shading units versus 768 on the Arc A310. The Arc A750 also has more RT cores (28 vs 6) and more AI cores (448 vs 96), strengthening its ray-tracing and AI-upscaling performance.

Price & Value

The Arc A310 currently lists from $25,439 JPY, $14,694 JPY less than the Arc A750 at $40,133 JPY. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Arc A750 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 185%. The Arc A310 still sits about $25,309 JPY above its $130 JPY MSRP. The Arc A750 still sits about $39,844 JPY above its $289 JPY MSRP.

Power & Efficiency

At 30W against 225W, the Arc A310 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power.

VRAM & Future-Proofing

The Arc A750 carries 8GB versus 4GB on the Arc A310. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers. The Arc A750's memory is also faster — 512 GB/s versus 124 GB/s (256-bit vs 64-bit bus) — which helps feed the GPU at 4K and with heavy textures.

Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Arc A750?

The Arc A750 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Arc A310 if you find it at a steep discount.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Arc A750 better than the Arc A310?

The Arc A750 is dramatically faster, roughly 350% ahead. If your budget allows, it's the stronger pick.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the Arc A750?

Neither is a dedicated 4K card; both are best at 1080p. For 4K you'd want a faster GPU, or lean on upscaling.

Is the Arc A750 worth the extra $14,694 JPY over the Arc A310?

Often yes — despite the higher price the Arc A750 delivers better performance-per-dollar here.

Does the Arc A750 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?

Its 8GB (vs 4GB) gives real headroom for 4K, heavy texture mods, and creative/AI work. At 1080p the gap matters less.

Which is better for ray tracing, the Arc A750 or the Arc A310?

Both handle ray tracing, but the Arc A750 has more RT cores, giving it better ray-tracing and AI-upscaling performance than the Arc A310.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationArc A310Arc A750
ArchitectureAlchemistAlchemist
Process NodeTSMC N6TSMC N6
CUDA Cores (Shading Units / Shading Units)7683,584
Ray Tracing Cores628
Tensor / AI Cores96448

Clock Speeds

SpecificationArc A310Arc A750
Base Clock2,000 MHz2,050 MHz
Boost Clock2,000 MHz2,400 MHz

Memory

SpecificationArc A310Arc A750
VRAM Capacity4 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus64-bit256-bit
Memory Speed15.5 Gbps16 Gbps
Bandwidth124 GB/s512 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationArc A310Arc A750
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP30 W225 W
Power ConnectorsNone2x 8-pin
ReleasedOct 2022Oct 2022