Arc A750 vs Radeon RX Vega 64
Performance-wise the Arc A750 is out front, significantly faster, roughly 29% up on the Radeon RX Vega 64. It is also the stronger value pick here, so it's the easy recommendation if your budget allows.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Arc A750 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Arc A750 vs Radeon RX Vega 64
The Arc A750 is significantly faster, around 29% ahead of the Radeon RX Vega 64. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Arc A750 starts at $180 EUR against $3,147 EUR for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Arc A750 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 2146%. The Arc A750 is trading below its $289 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal. The Radeon RX Vega 64 still sits about $2,648 EUR above its $499 EUR MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A750 sips power at 225W next to the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W, and still leads on performance-per-watt — quieter, cooler, and gentler on your PSU. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A750 is roughly 5 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 64 (Alchemist vs GCN 5.0 (Vega)), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A750 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A750 or Radeon RX Vega 64?
The Arc A750 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Radeon RX Vega 64 if you find it at a steep discount.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Arc A750 better than the Radeon RX Vega 64?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A750 or the Radeon RX Vega 64?
Is the Radeon RX Vega 64 worth the extra $2,967 EUR over the Arc A750?
Which should you buy: Arc A750 or Radeon RX Vega 64?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A750 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | GCN 5.0 (Vega) |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | GloFo 14nm |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / Stream Processors) | 3,584 | 4,096✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | — |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 448 | — |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A750 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,050 MHz✓ | 1,247 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2,400 MHz✓ | 1,546 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A750 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bus | 256-bit | 2048-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 16 Gbps✓ | 1.89 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 512 GB/s✓ | 483.8 GB/s |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A750 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 225 W✓ | 295 W |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Oct 2022 | Aug 2017 |
Related Reading
Intel Arc Alchemist in 2026: Is a Used A580, A750 or A770 Still Worth Buying?
Every Arc Alchemist card is discontinued, and Battlemage replaced them. So what does a used A580, A750 or A770 still buy you — and at what price does it beat a new Arc B580? An honest retrospective on Intel's first discrete GPUs.
Intel Arc A770 in 2026: The Used-Market 16GB Card — What Still Works, and What Still Breaks
The A770 is discontinued Alchemist silicon with a 16GB frame buffer and a 256-bit bus. Four years of driver work fixed a lot — and left some things broken. An honest read on who should buy one used, and who absolutely should not.