Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX TITAN
On raw speed the GeForce GTX TITAN comes out ahead: well ahead on speed, about 25% ahead of the Arc A310. That said, the Arc A310 is the smarter buy on value — $1,054 EUR less for the performance on offer.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX TITAN vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX TITAN vs Arc A310
The GeForce GTX TITAN is significantly faster, around 25% ahead of the Arc A310. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The Arc A310 currently lists from $144 EUR, $1,054 EUR less than the GeForce GTX TITAN at $1,198 EUR. Despite being slower, the Arc A310 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~568% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce GTX TITAN still sits about $199 EUR above its $999 EUR MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 30W against 230W, the Arc A310 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
VRAM favors the GeForce GTX TITAN at 6GB versus 4GB on the Arc A310 — that extra 2GB matters most at 4K, with high-res texture packs, and for content-creation/local-AI work.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A310 is roughly 9 years newer than the GeForce GTX TITAN (Alchemist vs Kepler), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce GTX TITAN offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or GeForce GTX TITAN?
Choose the GeForce GTX TITAN if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A310 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce GTX TITAN better than the Arc A310?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the GeForce GTX TITAN?
Is the GeForce GTX TITAN worth the extra $1,054 EUR over the Arc A310?
Does the GeForce GTX TITAN have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or GeForce GTX TITAN?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Kepler |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | TSMC 28nm |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / CUDA Cores) | 768 | 2,688✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | — |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 96 | — |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 837 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 876 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit | 384-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 15.5 Gbps✓ | 6 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 288.4 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 30 W✓ | 230 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Released | Oct 2022 | Feb 2013 |
