Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4070
On raw speed the GeForce RTX 4070 comes out ahead: far and away the quicker card, about 106% ahead of the Arc A750.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Arc A750: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce RTX 4070 vs Arc A750
The GeForce RTX 4070 is dramatically faster, around 106% ahead of the Arc A750. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the GeForce RTX 4070 is comfortable at 1440p, while the Arc A750 is better matched to 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
At 200W against 225W, the GeForce RTX 4070 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Ada Lovelace architecture on a TSMC N4 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
VRAM favors the GeForce RTX 4070 at 12GB versus 8GB on the Arc A750 — that extra 4GB matters most at 4K, with high-res texture packs, and for content-creation/local-AI work.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A750 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce RTX 4070 offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A750 or GeForce RTX 4070?
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster card by about 106%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce RTX 4070 better than the Arc A750?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A750 or the GeForce RTX 4070?
Does the GeForce RTX 4070 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: Arc A750 or GeForce RTX 4070?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | TSMC N4 |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / CUDA Cores) | 3,584 | 5,888✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 46✓ |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 448✓ | 184 |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,050 MHz✓ | 1,920 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2,400 MHz | 2,475 MHz✓ |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bus | 256-bit✓ | 192-bit |
| Memory Speed | 16 Gbps | 21 Gbps✓ |
| Bandwidth | 512 GB/s✓ | 504 GB/s |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TDP | 225 W | 200 W✓ |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| Released | Oct 2022 | Apr 2023 |
Related Reading
Intel Arc Alchemist in 2026: Is a Used A580, A750 or A770 Still Worth Buying?
Every Arc Alchemist card is discontinued, and Battlemage replaced them. So what does a used A580, A750 or A770 still buy you — and at what price does it beat a new Arc B580? An honest retrospective on Intel's first discrete GPUs.
Intel Arc A770 in 2026: The Used-Market 16GB Card — What Still Works, and What Still Breaks
The A770 is discontinued Alchemist silicon with a 16GB frame buffer and a 256-bit bus. Four years of driver work fixed a lot — and left some things broken. An honest read on who should buy one used, and who absolutely should not.
Is a Used RTX 4070 Still Worth Buying? A Secondary-Market Guide
Two generations on, the RTX 4070 has become a used-market staple rather than a new purchase. Here's what it still does well, what 12GB costs you, and exactly what to check before buying one secondhand.