GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
Market comparison is currently pending while we verify the latest benchmarks for Arc A310 and GeForce GTX TITAN Z.
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is significantly faster than the Arc A310, leading by roughly 25% in our performance index.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Arc A310
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is significantly faster, around 25% ahead of the Arc A310. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A310 draws just 30W versus 375W for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 12GB against 4GB, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the Arc A310's 4GB can fall short.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A310 is roughly 8 years newer than the GeForce GTX TITAN Z (Alchemist vs Kepler), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the faster card by about 25%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce GTX TITAN Z better than the Arc A310?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Does the GeForce GTX TITAN Z have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Kepler |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | TSMC 28nm |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / CUDA Cores) | 768 | 2,880✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | — |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 96 | — |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 705 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 876 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit | 384-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 15.5 Gbps✓ | 7 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 336 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A310 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 30 W✓ | 375 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Oct 2022 | May 2014 |