GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Workstation Verdict

The RTX A4000 has more VRAM (16GB vs 12GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 56% higher (448 GB/s vs 288 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput. The RTX A2000 is $530 USD cheaper than the RTX A4000.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
NVIDIA
RTX A2000
Price
$350 USD
VRAM
12 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
288 GB/s
FP32 Compute
8 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage

Comparable or lower specs

NVIDIA
RTX A4000
Price
$880 USD
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
448 GB/s
FP32 Compute
19.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+140% FP32 (TFLOPS) (19.2 TFLOPS vs 8 TFLOPS)
+85% CUDA Cores (6,144 vs 3,328)
+56% Bandwidth (448 GB/s vs 288 GB/s)

RTX A2000 vs RTX A4000: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: RTX A2000 vs RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 carries 16GB of VRAM versus 12GB on the RTX A2000. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 4GB advantage here means the RTX A4000 can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The RTX A4000 delivers 448 GB/s versus 288 GB/s on the RTX A2000, a 56% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the RTX A4000 will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The RTX A4000 delivers 19.2 TFLOPS against 8 TFLOPS for the RTX A2000 — a 140% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the RTX A4000.

Price & Value

The RTX A2000 lists from $350 USD, $530 USD less than the RTX A4000 at $880 USD. For budget-constrained teams, the savings may outweigh the spec gap — especially if the smaller card covers your typical workload.

Which should you buy: RTX A2000 or RTX A4000?

Choose the RTX A4000 for maximum capacity — it leads on VRAM, bandwidth, and compute, making it the better fit for large models and training jobs. The RTX A2000 is the more budget-friendly option ($530 USD less) — a solid choice if your models fit within its 12GB and inference volume is moderate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the RTX A2000 or RTX A4000 run large language models?

Both can, but the RTX A4000 (16GB) handles larger models without quantization. The RTX A2000 (12GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the RTX A2000 or the RTX A4000?

The RTX A4000 is faster for token generation — its 448 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 288 GB/s on the RTX A2000 is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The RTX A4000 has the advantage at 19.2 TFLOPS vs 8 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the RTX A2000.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationRTX A2000RTX A4000
ArchitectureAmpereAmpere
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / CUDA Cores)3,3286,144

Memory

SpecificationRTX A2000RTX A4000
VRAM Capacity12 GB16 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus192-bit256-bit
Bandwidth288 GB/s448 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationRTX A2000RTX A4000
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP70 W140 W
ReleasedAug 2021Apr 2021

Workstation

SpecificationRTX A2000RTX A4000
FP32 (TFLOPS)8 TFLOPS19.2 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoNo
Form factorlow-profilesingle-slot