GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Workstation Verdict

The Radeon PRO W7800 has more VRAM (32GB vs 16GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 29% higher (576 GB/s vs 448 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput. The RTX A4000 is $1,619 USD cheaper than the Radeon PRO W7800.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
Price
$2,499 USD
VRAM
32 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
576 GB/s
FP32 Compute
45.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+135% FP32 (TFLOPS) (45.2 TFLOPS vs 19.2 TFLOPS)
+29% Bandwidth (576 GB/s vs 448 GB/s)
NVIDIA
RTX A4000
Price
$880 USD
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
448 GB/s
FP32 Compute
19.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+60% CUDA Cores (6,144 vs 3,840)

Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX A4000: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX A4000

The Radeon PRO W7800 carries 32GB of VRAM versus 16GB on the RTX A4000. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 16GB advantage here means the Radeon PRO W7800 can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The Radeon PRO W7800 delivers 576 GB/s versus 448 GB/s on the RTX A4000, a 29% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the Radeon PRO W7800 will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The Radeon PRO W7800 delivers 45.2 TFLOPS against 19.2 TFLOPS for the RTX A4000 — a 135% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the Radeon PRO W7800.

Price & Value

The RTX A4000 lists from $880 USD, $1,619 USD less than the Radeon PRO W7800 at $2,499 USD. For budget-constrained teams, the savings may outweigh the spec gap — especially if the smaller card covers your typical workload.

Which should you buy: Radeon PRO W7800 or RTX A4000?

Choose the Radeon PRO W7800 for maximum capacity — it leads on VRAM, bandwidth, and compute, making it the better fit for large models and training jobs. The RTX A4000 is the more budget-friendly option ($1,619 USD less) — a solid choice if your models fit within its 16GB and inference volume is moderate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Radeon PRO W7800 or RTX A4000 run large language models?

Both can, but the Radeon PRO W7800 (32GB) handles larger models without quantization. The RTX A4000 (16GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the Radeon PRO W7800 or the RTX A4000?

The Radeon PRO W7800 is faster for token generation — its 576 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 448 GB/s on the RTX A4000 is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The Radeon PRO W7800 has the advantage at 45.2 TFLOPS vs 19.2 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the RTX A4000.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4000
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ampere
CUDA Cores (Stream Processors / CUDA Cores)3,8406,144

Memory

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4000
VRAM Capacity32 GB16 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus256-bit256-bit
Bandwidth576 GB/s448 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4000
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP260 W140 W
ReleasedMar 2023Apr 2021

Workstation

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4000
FP32 (TFLOPS)45.2 TFLOPS19.2 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoNo
Form factordual-slotsingle-slot