GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Workstation Verdict

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has more VRAM (20GB vs 8GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 46% higher (280 GB/s vs 192 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
AMD
Radeon PRO W7500
Price
$429 USD
VRAM
8 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
192 GB/s
FP32 Compute
14.5 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage

Comparable or lower specs

Price
Awaiting Data
VRAM
20 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
280 GB/s
FP32 Compute
19.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+300% CUDA Cores (6,144 vs 1,536)
+46% Bandwidth (280 GB/s vs 192 GB/s)
+32% FP32 (TFLOPS) (19.2 TFLOPS vs 14.5 TFLOPS)

Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: Radeon PRO W7500 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation carries 20GB of VRAM versus 8GB on the Radeon PRO W7500. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 12GB advantage here means the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation delivers 280 GB/s versus 192 GB/s on the Radeon PRO W7500, a 46% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation delivers 19.2 TFLOPS against 14.5 TFLOPS for the Radeon PRO W7500 — a 32% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.

Which should you buy: Radeon PRO W7500 or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the stronger choice for large-model workloads where VRAM is the bottleneck. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more economical, and sufficient if your models fit within its 8GB.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Radeon PRO W7500 or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation run large language models?

Both can, but the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (20GB) handles larger models without quantization. The Radeon PRO W7500 (8GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the Radeon PRO W7500 or the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is faster for token generation — its 280 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 192 GB/s on the Radeon PRO W7500 is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has the advantage at 19.2 TFLOPS vs 14.5 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the Radeon PRO W7500.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7500RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
CUDA Cores (Stream Processors / CUDA Cores)1,5366,144

Memory

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7500RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity8 GB20 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus128-bit160-bit
Bandwidth192 GB/s280 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7500RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP70 W70 W
ReleasedApr 2023Feb 2023

Workstation

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7500RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
FP32 (TFLOPS)14.5 TFLOPS19.2 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoNo
Form factorlow-profilelow-profile