GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the Radeon RX 6800 comes out noticeably faster — about 18% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3070. But the GeForce RTX 3070 is the better value, undercutting it by $105 USD for the performance you get.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce RTX 3070: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce RTX 3070
The Radeon RX 6800 is noticeably faster, around 18% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3070. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to 1440p.
Price & Value
The GeForce RTX 3070 currently lists from $285 USD, $105 USD less than the Radeon RX 6800 at $390 USD. Despite being slower, the GeForce RTX 3070 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~16% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce RTX 3070 is trading below its $499 USD MSRP — a genuine deal. The Radeon RX 6800 is trading below its $579 USD MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
On power, the GeForce RTX 3070 is the gentler choice at 220W versus 250W. The Radeon RX 6800 is more efficient per watt because it's faster, but its higher 250W draw means more heat and a bigger PSU.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon RX 6800 carries 16GB versus 8GB on the GeForce RTX 3070. The extra 8GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce RTX 3070 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX 6800 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce RTX 3070 or Radeon RX 6800?
Choose the Radeon RX 6800 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce RTX 3070 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.