GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the Radeon RX Vega 64 comes out noticeably faster — about 15% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3050. It also wins on performance-per-dollar, making it the cleaner choice when you can afford it.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 3050: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 3050
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is noticeably faster, around 15% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3050. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX Vega 64 is comfortable at 1080p, while the GeForce RTX 3050 is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The Radeon RX Vega 64 currently lists from $200 USD, $10 USD less than the GeForce RTX 3050 at $210 USD. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Radeon RX Vega 64 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 21%. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is trading below its $499 USD MSRP — a genuine deal. The GeForce RTX 3050 is trading below its $249 USD MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
At 130W against 295W, the GeForce RTX 3050 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce RTX 3050 is roughly 5 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 64, so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce RTX 3050 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce RTX 3050 or Radeon RX Vega 64?
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the GeForce RTX 3050 if you find it at a steep discount.