GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
Only verified data for GeForce GTX 1650 is available. Benchmarks for other models are currently being processed.
On raw speed the Intel Arc A370M comes out noticeably faster — about 14% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the cheaper option by $1,299 USD.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Intel Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1650: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Intel Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1650
The Intel Arc A370M is noticeably faster, around 14% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The GeForce GTX 1650 currently lists from $100 USD, $1,299 USD less than the Intel Arc A370M at $1,399 USD. The GeForce GTX 1650 is trading below its $149 USD MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
At 50W against 75W, the Intel Arc A370M is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
Generation & Longevity
The Intel Arc A370M is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1650 (Alchemist vs Turing), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Intel Arc A370M offers Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Intel Arc A370M?
The Intel Arc A370M is the faster card by about 14%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Intel Arc A370M better than the GeForce GTX 1650?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 or the Intel Arc A370M?
Is the Intel Arc A370M worth the extra $1,299 USD over the GeForce GTX 1650?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Alchemist |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | TSMC N6 |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Shading Units) | 896 | 1,024✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | — | 8 |
| Tensor / AI Cores | — | 128 |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,485 MHz | 1,550 MHz✓ |
| Boost Clock | 1,665 MHz | 2,050 MHz✓ |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit✓ | 64-bit |
| Memory Speed | 8 Gbps | 14 Gbps✓ |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s✓ | 112 GB/s |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TDP | 75 W | 50 W✓ |
| Power Connectors | None | None |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Mar 2022 |