GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon R9 390X
On raw speed the Radeon R9 390X comes out ahead: well ahead on speed, about 25% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1630. That said, the GeForce GTX 1630 is the smarter buy on value β $170 USD less for the performance on offer.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce GTX 1630: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce GTX 1630
The Radeon R9 390X is significantly faster, around 25% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1630. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The GeForce GTX 1630 currently lists from $259 USD, $170 USD less than the Radeon R9 390X at $429 USD. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1630 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~33% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce GTX 1630 still sits about $110 USD above its $149 USD MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 75W against 275W, the GeForce GTX 1630 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
VRAM favors the Radeon R9 390X at 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1630 β that extra 4GB matters most at 4K, with high-res texture packs, and for content-creation/local-AI work.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1630 is roughly 7 years newer than the Radeon R9 390X (Turing vs GCN 2.0), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1630 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon R9 390X offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1630 or Radeon R9 390X?
Choose the Radeon R9 390X if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1630 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon R9 390X better than the GeForce GTX 1630?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1630 or the Radeon R9 390X?
Is the Radeon R9 390X worth the extra $170 USD over the GeForce GTX 1630?
Does the Radeon R9 390X have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1630 or Radeon R9 390X?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | TSMC 28nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 512 | 2,816β |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,740 MHzβ | 1,050 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,785 MHzβ | 1,050 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GBβ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit | 512-bitβ |
| Memory Speed | 12 Gbpsβ | 6 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 384 GB/sβ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1630 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 75 Wβ | 275 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Released | Jun 2022 | Jun 2015 |