GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Quick Verdict

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster than the Arc A310, leading by roughly 900% in our performance index. It is also the stronger value pick here, so it's the easy recommendation if your budget allows.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
Price
$140 USD
Performance
4%
VRAM
4 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage

Comparable or lower specs

AMD
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Price
$470 USD
Performance
40%
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage
+1233% Ray Accelerators (80 vs 6)
+567% Stream Processors (5,120 vs 768)
+313% Bandwidth (512 GB/s vs 124 GB/s)

Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Arc A310

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster, around 900% ahead of the Arc A310. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 6900 XT is comfortable at 1440p, while the Arc A310 is better matched to entry-level 1080p.

Price & Value

Right now the Arc A310 starts at $140 USD against $470 USD for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Radeon RX 6900 XT wins on performance-per-dollar by about 198%. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is trading below its $999 USD MSRP — a genuine deal.

Power & Efficiency

The Arc A310 draws just 30W versus 300W for the Radeon RX 6900 XT, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.

VRAM & Future-Proofing

With 16GB against 4GB, the Radeon RX 6900 XT has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the Arc A310's 4GB can fall short.

Generation & Longevity

The Arc A310 is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX 6900 XT (Alchemist vs RDNA 2), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.

Features & Ecosystem

Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.

Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Radeon RX 6900 XT?

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Arc A310 if you find it at a steep discount.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT better than the Arc A310?

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster, roughly 900% ahead. If your budget allows, it's the stronger pick.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the Radeon RX 6900 XT?

Neither is a dedicated 4K card; both are best at 1440p. For 4K you'd want a faster GPU, or lean on upscaling.

Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT worth the extra $330 USD over the Arc A310?

Often yes — despite the higher price the Radeon RX 6900 XT delivers better performance-per-dollar here.

Does the Radeon RX 6900 XT have enough VRAM advantage to matter?

Its 16GB (vs 4GB) gives real headroom for 4K, heavy texture mods, and creative/AI work. At 1080p the gap matters less.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationArc A310Radeon RX 6900 XT
ArchitectureAlchemistRDNA 2
Process NodeTSMC N6TSMC N7
CUDA Cores (Shading Units / Stream Processors)7685,120
Ray Tracing Cores680
Tensor / AI Cores96

Clock Speeds

SpecificationArc A310Radeon RX 6900 XT
Base Clock2,000 MHz1,825 MHz
Boost Clock2,000 MHz2,250 MHz

Memory

SpecificationArc A310Radeon RX 6900 XT
VRAM Capacity4 GB16 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus64-bit256-bit
Memory Speed15.5 Gbps16 Gbps
Bandwidth124 GB/s512 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationArc A310Radeon RX 6900 XT
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP30 W300 W
Power ConnectorsNone2x 8-pin
ReleasedOct 2022Dec 2020