GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Workstation Verdict

The Radeon PRO W7800 has more VRAM (32GB vs 20GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 11% higher (640 GB/s vs 576 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
Price
Awaiting Data
VRAM
32 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
576 GB/s
FP32 Compute
45.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+91% FP32 (TFLOPS) (45.2 TFLOPS vs 23.7 TFLOPS)
NVIDIA
RTX A4500
Price
£1,157
VRAM
20 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
640 GB/s
FP32 Compute
23.7 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+87% CUDA Cores (7,168 vs 3,840)
+25% Memory Bus (320-bit vs 256-bit)
+11% Bandwidth (640 GB/s vs 576 GB/s)

Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX A4500: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: Radeon PRO W7800 vs RTX A4500

The Radeon PRO W7800 carries 32GB of VRAM versus 20GB on the RTX A4500. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 12GB advantage here means the Radeon PRO W7800 can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The RTX A4500 delivers 640 GB/s versus 576 GB/s on the Radeon PRO W7800, a 11% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the RTX A4500 will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The Radeon PRO W7800 delivers 45.2 TFLOPS against 23.7 TFLOPS for the RTX A4500 — a 91% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the Radeon PRO W7800.

Which should you buy: Radeon PRO W7800 or RTX A4500?

These cards suit different priorities. Choose the Radeon PRO W7800 if fitting larger models in VRAM is your constraint. Choose the RTX A4500 if your models already fit and you want faster inference throughput from its higher memory bandwidth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Radeon PRO W7800 or RTX A4500 run large language models?

Both can, but the Radeon PRO W7800 (32GB) handles larger models without quantization. The RTX A4500 (20GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the Radeon PRO W7800 or the RTX A4500?

The RTX A4500 is faster for token generation — its 640 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 576 GB/s on the Radeon PRO W7800 is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The Radeon PRO W7800 has the advantage at 45.2 TFLOPS vs 23.7 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the RTX A4500.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4500
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ampere
CUDA Cores (Stream Processors / CUDA Cores)3,8407,168

Memory

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4500
VRAM Capacity32 GB20 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus256-bit320-bit
Bandwidth576 GB/s640 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4500
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP260 W200 W
ReleasedMar 2023Oct 2021

Workstation

SpecificationRadeon PRO W7800RTX A4500
FP32 (TFLOPS)45.2 TFLOPS23.7 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoYes
Form factordual-slotdual-slot