GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the Radeon R9 390 comes out dramatically faster — about 400% ahead of the GeForce GTX 750. It also wins on performance-per-dollar, making it the cleaner choice when you can afford it.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 750: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 750
The Radeon R9 390 is dramatically faster, around 400% ahead of the GeForce GTX 750. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The GeForce GTX 750 currently lists from $230 GBP, $282 GBP less than the Radeon R9 390 at $512 GBP. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Radeon R9 390 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 125%. The GeForce GTX 750 still sits about $111 GBP above its $119 GBP MSRP. The Radeon R9 390 still sits about $183 GBP above its $329 GBP MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 55W against 275W, the GeForce GTX 750 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon R9 390 carries 8GB versus 1GB on the GeForce GTX 750. The extra 7GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 750 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon R9 390 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 750 or Radeon R9 390?
The Radeon R9 390 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the GeForce GTX 750 if you find it at a steep discount.