GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is noticeably faster than the GeForce GTX 1060, leading by roughly 11% in our performance index. The GeForce GTX 1060, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $285 GBP cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1060: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is noticeably faster, around 11% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1060. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the GeForce GTX 1060 starts at $134 GBP against $419 GBP for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1060 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~182% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce GTX 1060 is trading below its $299 GBP MSRP — a genuine deal. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still sits about $260 GBP above its $159 GBP MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws just 100W versus 120W for the GeForce GTX 1060, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 6GB against 4GB, the GeForce GTX 1060 has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 4GB can fall short.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1060 (Turing vs Pascal), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1060 or GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Choose the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1060 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.