GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the clear winner, offering 18.5% better value than Radeon RX 6900 XT.
On raw speed the Radeon RX 6900 XT comes out dramatically faster — about 300% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. But the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the better value, undercutting it by $2,842 AED for the performance you get.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Comparable or lower specs
Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster, around 300% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 6900 XT is comfortable at 1440p, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB currently lists from $760 AED, $2,842 AED less than the Radeon RX 6900 XT at $3,602 AED. Despite being slower, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers the better performance-per-dollar (~18% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still sits about $591 AED above its $169 AED MSRP. The Radeon RX 6900 XT still sits about $2,603 AED above its $999 AED MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
On power, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the gentler choice at 130W versus 300W. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is more efficient per watt because it's faster, but its higher 300W draw means more heat and a bigger PSU.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon RX 6900 XT carries 16GB versus 6GB on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. The extra 10GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX 6900 XT (Ampere vs RDNA 2), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB or Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Choose the Radeon RX 6900 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT better than the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB or the Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT worth the extra $2,842 AED over the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Does the Radeon RX 6900 XT have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | Samsung 8nm | TSMC N7 |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 2,560 | 5,120✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 80✓ |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 80 | — |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,552 MHz | 1,825 MHz✓ |
| Boost Clock | 1,777 MHz | 2,250 MHz✓ |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 256-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 14 Gbps | 16 Gbps✓ |
| Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TDP | 130 W✓ | 300 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Jan 2022 | Dec 2020 |