GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
GeForce GTX 1650 is the clear winner, offering 21.3% better value than Radeon RX Vega 64.
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is dramatically faster than the GeForce GTX 1650, leading by roughly 100% in our performance index. The GeForce GTX 1650, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $1,886 AED cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1650: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1650
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is dramatically faster, around 100% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX Vega 64 is comfortable at 1080p, while the GeForce GTX 1650 is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the GeForce GTX 1650 starts at $1,324 AED against $3,210 AED for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~21% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce GTX 1650 still sits about $1,175 AED above its $149 AED MSRP. The Radeon RX Vega 64 still sits about $2,711 AED above its $499 AED MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws just 75W versus 295W for the Radeon RX Vega 64, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 8GB against 4GB, the Radeon RX Vega 64 has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 1650's 4GB can fall short.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 64 (Turing vs GCN 5.0 (Vega)), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon RX Vega 64?
Choose the Radeon RX Vega 64 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1650 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon RX Vega 64 better than the GeForce GTX 1650?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 or the Radeon RX Vega 64?
Is the Radeon RX Vega 64 worth the extra $1,886 AED over the GeForce GTX 1650?
Does the Radeon RX Vega 64 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 (Vega) |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | GloFo 14nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 896 | 4,096✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,485 MHz✓ | 1,247 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,665 MHz✓ | 1,546 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 2048-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 8 Gbps✓ | 1.89 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 75 W✓ | 295 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Aug 2017 |