GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
GeForce GTX 1650 is the clear winner, offering 125.6% better value than Radeon R9 390.
On raw speed the GeForce GTX 1650 comes out dramatically faster — about 40% ahead of the Radeon R9 390. It also wins on performance-per-dollar, making it the cleaner choice when you can afford it.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390
The GeForce GTX 1650 is dramatically faster, around 40% ahead of the Radeon R9 390. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The GeForce GTX 1650 currently lists from $1,324 AED, $809 AED less than the Radeon R9 390 at $2,133 AED. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the GeForce GTX 1650 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 126%. The GeForce GTX 1650 still sits about $1,175 AED above its $149 AED MSRP. The Radeon R9 390 still sits about $1,804 AED above its $329 AED MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 75W against 275W, the GeForce GTX 1650 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon R9 390 carries 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 is roughly 4 years newer than the Radeon R9 390 (Turing vs GCN 2.0), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon R9 390 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon R9 390?
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Radeon R9 390 if you find it at a steep discount.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce GTX 1650 better than the Radeon R9 390?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 or the Radeon R9 390?
Is the Radeon R9 390 worth the extra $809 AED over the GeForce GTX 1650?
Does the Radeon R9 390 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | TSMC 28nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 896 | 2,560✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,485 MHz✓ | 1,000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,665 MHz✓ | 1,000 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 512-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 8 Gbps✓ | 6 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 384 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 75 W✓ | 275 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Jun 2015 |