GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
Radeon RX 6900 XT is the clear winner, offering 107.5% better value than Arc A310.
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster than the Arc A310, leading by roughly 900% in our performance index. It is also the stronger value pick here, so it's the easy recommendation if your budget allows.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Comparable or lower specs
Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Arc A310
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster, around 900% ahead of the Arc A310. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 6900 XT is comfortable at 1440p, while the Arc A310 is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Arc A310 starts at $747 AED against $3,602 AED for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Radeon RX 6900 XT wins on performance-per-dollar by about 107%. The Arc A310 still sits about $617 AED above its $130 AED MSRP. The Radeon RX 6900 XT still sits about $2,603 AED above its $999 AED MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The Arc A310 draws just 30W versus 300W for the Radeon RX 6900 XT, and it also delivers more performance per watt — so it runs cooler and quieter and needs less PSU headroom. Its more modern Alchemist architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 16GB against 4GB, the Radeon RX 6900 XT has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the Arc A310's 4GB can fall short.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A310 is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX 6900 XT (Alchemist vs RDNA 2), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A310 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Radeon RX 6900 XT?
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Arc A310 if you find it at a steep discount.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT better than the Arc A310?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT worth the extra $2,855 AED over the Arc A310?
Does the Radeon RX 6900 XT have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | TSMC N7 |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / Stream Processors) | 768 | 5,120✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 80✓ |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 96 | — |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 1,825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2,000 MHz | 2,250 MHz✓ |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit | 256-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 15.5 Gbps | 16 Gbps✓ |
| Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 512 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A310 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TDP | 30 W✓ | 300 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Oct 2022 | Dec 2020 |