Skip to content

Best GPU for NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B Locally

Real-time prices and hardware recommendations updated for August 2026.

4B
4B
dense

NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B is a dense model: all 4B parameters activate on every token, so generation speed is bound by how fast your card can stream the full weights.

To run NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B locally you need roughly 2.8 GB of VRAM at Q4_K_M quantization with a 32k token context. The best-value card that fits is the GeForce RTX 5060 (8 GB), which should generate around 61 tokens per second.

Adjust Context Length

Slide to popular sizes or type any value manually.

k tokens
8k
16k
32k
64k
128k
256k
Budget EntryQ3_K_M quant
1.7 GB
0.5 GB
Total VRAM:2.2 GB

Recommended Hardware

GeForce RTX 5060
1725 tok/sprefill
73 tok/sgeneration
AED 1539.98·8GB VRAM
View Card
Arc B580
1532 tok/sprefill
63 tok/sgeneration
AED 1558.65·12GB VRAM
View Card

Weights are ~1.7 GB at Q3. Even with a 32k context window the total stays under 3 GB — 6 GB cards run this comfortably.

Balanced Sweet SpotQ4_K_M quant
2.3 GB
0.5 GB
Total VRAM:2.8 GB

Recommended Hardware

GeForce RTX 5060
1725 tok/sprefill
61 tok/sgeneration
AED 1539.98·8GB VRAM
View Card
Arc B580
1532 tok/sprefill
52 tok/sgeneration
AED 1558.65·12GB VRAM
View Card
GeForce RTX 4070
1693 tok/sprefill
58 tok/sgeneration
AED 2600·12GB VRAM
View Card

Q4 weights (~2.3 GB) plus KV cache keep the total under 3 GB at 32k context. 8 GB cards provide generous headroom for larger context windows.

Near LosslessQ8_0 quant
4.6 GB
0.5 GB
Total VRAM:5.1 GB

Recommended Hardware

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
1725 tok/sprefill
36 tok/sgeneration
AED 2962.46·16GB VRAM
View Card
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
968 tok/sprefill
19 tok/sgeneration
AED 3200·16GB VRAM
View Card

Near-lossless Q8 weights (~4.6 GB) fit comfortably on any modern 8 GB card. For 128k+ context windows, 12 GB cards provide extra headroom.

Other models with the same VRAM requirement

Because NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B's weights fit a 8 GB card, other models of a similar size run on the same GPU. Generation speed varies — mixture-of-experts models are faster, dense models slower — but any of these load in the same VRAM:

Gemma 2 9B9BSOLAR 10.7B10.7B

Optimizing Setup for NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B

Quantization Recommendations

For daily coding and reasoning tasks, Q4_K_M (4-bit quantization) offers the best balance of quality and memory efficiency — it reduces memory requirements by over 70% with minimal quality loss compared to FP16. Q8 and higher presets preserve more fidelity at the cost of significantly higher VRAM usage, which may force layer offloading and hurt throughput.

Recommended Local Software

We recommend using Ollama as the primary runner for local inference due to its automated GPU model splitting and context cache optimizations. For advanced fine-tuning or quantization splits, llama.cpp with Flash Attention compiled natively provides the best granular control.

Running NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B locally — FAQ

How much VRAM do I need to run NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B?

At a 32k context with KV cache quantization on, NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B needs about 2.8 GB of VRAM at Q4_K_M — the quantization most people should use. Dropping to Q3_K_M brings that down to roughly 2.2 GB at some quality cost, while Q8_0 needs about 5.1 GB for the best quality this model can give.

What size graphics card does NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B fit on?

NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B needs about 2.8 GB at Q4_K_M, so a 8 GB card is the smallest common size that holds it entirely in VRAM. Anything smaller has to offload layers to system RAM, which typically costs you most of your generation speed.

Which quantization should I use for NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B?

Use Q4_K_M unless you have VRAM to spare. It needs about 2.8 GB and loses very little quality against full precision. Q8_0 needs about 5.1 GB for a quality gain most people cannot detect in everyday coding and chat. Spend spare VRAM on a longer context instead.

How does context length affect the VRAM NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B needs?

Model weights are fixed, but the KV cache grows linearly with context. For NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B at a 32k context the cache is about 0.5 GB; doubling to 64k takes it to roughly 1 GB. Turning KV cache quantization off doubles those figures again.

Can the same GPU run other models similar to NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B?

Yes. NVIDIA Nemotron-3-Nano-4B needs about 2.8 GB at Q4_K_M, and any model whose weights fit the same card runs on it — including Gemma 2 9B (9B), SOLAR 10.7B (10.7B). The weights fit the same GPU; generation speed varies (mixture-of-experts models are faster, dense models slower).

How token speeds are estimated

Two metrics are shown per GPU: Read tok/s (how fast the model ingests your prompt) and Decode tok/s (how fast it streams tokens back). They model fundamentally different bottlenecks.

📖

Read (Prefill)

The prompt is processed in one parallel pass. This is compute-bound: it saturates the GPU's tensor cores.

read tok/s ≈ TFLOPS × readFactor × 400 ÷ activeParams

Decode (Generation)

Each new token requires loading the entire model's active weights from VRAM. This is memory-bandwidth-bound: the GPU stalls waiting for data, not computing.

decode tok/s ≈ bandwidth × decodeFactor ÷ (weights + kv_cache)

Weights = (activeParams × bits ÷ 8) × 1.15 overhead. KV cache per step = activeParams × multiplier × contextK.

Architecture utilization factors

Architecture
Decode
Read
Blackwell, Xe2
0.45
0.55
Ada Lovelace, RDNA 4, Battlemage
0.38
0.48
Ampere, Turing, RDNA 3, Xe-HPG
0.28
0.38
Volta, RDNA 1/2
0.2
0.25
Pre-tensor-core (Pascal, Maxwell, Kepler, GCN, Alchemist)
0.12
0.15

Left: decode factor — Right: read factor

Data sources

TFLOPS and memory bandwidth are read from the GPU database. When missing, bandwidth falls back to a hardcoded dictionary.

Limitations

These are analytical estimates, not benchmark results. Use them as a relative comparison, not an absolute performance guarantee.