GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390X
The GeForce GTX 1650 pulls ahead here — in a different league, about 40% ahead of the Radeon R9 390X.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390X: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390X
The GeForce GTX 1650 is dramatically faster, around 40% ahead of the Radeon R9 390X. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
Power draw favors the GeForce GTX 1650 (75W vs 275W), and it's the more efficient card too, so it's the easy pick if thermals or a smaller PSU matter. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon R9 390X carries 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 is roughly 4 years newer than the Radeon R9 390X (Turing vs GCN 2.0), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon R9 390X offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon R9 390X?
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster card by about 40%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce GTX 1650 better than the Radeon R9 390X?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 or the Radeon R9 390X?
Does the Radeon R9 390X have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon R9 390X?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | TSMC 28nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 896 | 2,816✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,485 MHz✓ | 1,050 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,665 MHz✓ | 1,050 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 512-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 8 Gbps✓ | 6 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 384 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 75 W✓ | 275 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Jun 2015 |