Arc A310 vs Arc A770
On raw speed the Arc A770 comes out dramatically faster — about 400% ahead of the Arc A310. But the Arc A310 is the better value, undercutting it by $8,467 SEK for the performance you get.
Market Value Leader
Arc A310 is the clear winner, offering 41.8% better value than Arc A770.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Arc A770 vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Arc A770 vs Arc A310
The Arc A770 is dramatically faster, around 400% ahead of the Arc A310. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Arc A770 is comfortable at 1080p, while the Arc A310 is better matched to entry-level 1080p. The Arc A770 packs 4,096 shading units versus 768 on the Arc A310. The Arc A770 also has more RT cores (32 vs 6) and more AI cores (512 vs 96), strengthening its ray-tracing and AI-upscaling performance.
Price & Value
The Arc A310 currently lists from $1,390 SEK, $8,467 SEK less than the Arc A770 at $9,857 SEK. Despite being slower, the Arc A310 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~42% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Arc A310 still sits about $1,260 SEK above its $130 SEK MSRP. The Arc A770 still sits about $9,528 SEK above its $329 SEK MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 30W against 225W, the Arc A310 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Arc A770 carries 16GB versus 4GB on the Arc A310. The extra 12GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers. The Arc A770's memory is also faster — 560 GB/s versus 124 GB/s (256-bit vs 64-bit bus) — which helps feed the GPU at 4K and with heavy textures.
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Arc A770?
Choose the Arc A770 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A310 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Arc A770 better than the Arc A310?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A310 or the Arc A770?
Is the Arc A770 worth the extra $8,467 SEK over the Arc A310?
Does the Arc A770 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which is better for ray tracing, the Arc A770 or the Arc A310?
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Arc A770?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A310 | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Alchemist |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | TSMC N6 |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / Shading Units) | 768 | 4,096✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 32✓ |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 96 | 512✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A310 | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,000 MHz | 2,100 MHz✓ |
| Boost Clock | 2,000 MHz | 2,400 MHz✓ |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A310 | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit | 256-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 15.5 Gbps | 17.5 Gbps✓ |
| Bandwidth | 124 GB/s | 560 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A310 | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TDP | 30 W✓ | 225 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Oct 2022 | Oct 2022 |
Related Reading
The Matured Flagship: Intel Arc A770 Market Review
With the Battlemage generation now in full swing, where does the original Alchemist flagship stand? We analyze the A770's value in the current market.
Best for: The Budget Content Creator & AI Hobbyist
Don't let 8GB limit your creativity. See how the A770's 16GB buffer handles 4K DaVinci Resolve timelines and Stable Diffusion.
How to Run Powerful Local LLMs on a Budget GPU in 2026
An 8GB GPU can now run near-flagship open models locally. Here's how QAT, MoE, llama.cpp offloading and MTP turn a budget PC into a private AI rig in 2026.