GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Workstation Verdict

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has more VRAM (20GB vs 16GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 60% higher (448 GB/s vs 280 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
NVIDIA
Quadro RTX 5000
Price
€742
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
448 GB/s
FP32 Compute
11.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+60% Bandwidth (448 GB/s vs 280 GB/s)
+60% Memory Bus (256-bit vs 160-bit)
Price
Awaiting Data
VRAM
20 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
280 GB/s
FP32 Compute
19.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+100% CUDA Cores (6,144 vs 3,072)
+71% FP32 (TFLOPS) (19.2 TFLOPS vs 11.2 TFLOPS)

Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation carries 20GB of VRAM versus 16GB on the Quadro RTX 5000. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 4GB advantage here means the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The Quadro RTX 5000 delivers 448 GB/s versus 280 GB/s on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, a 60% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the Quadro RTX 5000 will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation delivers 19.2 TFLOPS against 11.2 TFLOPS for the Quadro RTX 5000 — a 71% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.

Which should you buy: Quadro RTX 5000 or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

These cards suit different priorities. Choose the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation if fitting larger models in VRAM is your constraint. Choose the Quadro RTX 5000 if your models already fit and you want faster inference throughput from its higher memory bandwidth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Quadro RTX 5000 or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation run large language models?

Both can, but the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (20GB) handles larger models without quantization. The Quadro RTX 5000 (16GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the Quadro RTX 5000 or the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

The Quadro RTX 5000 is faster for token generation — its 448 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 280 GB/s on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has the advantage at 19.2 TFLOPS vs 11.2 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the Quadro RTX 5000.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
ArchitectureTuringAda Lovelace
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / CUDA Cores)3,0726,144

Memory

SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity16 GB20 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus256-bit160-bit
Bandwidth448 GB/s280 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP230 W70 W
ReleasedOct 2018Feb 2023

Workstation

SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
FP32 (TFLOPS)11.2 TFLOPS19.2 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoNo
Form factordual-slotlow-profile