GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Workstation Verdict

The Quadro RTX 8000 has more VRAM (48GB vs 32GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 39% higher (870 GB/s vs 624 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput. The Quadro RTX 8000 is $7,215 EUR cheaper than the Quadro GV100.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
Price
€11,600
VRAM
32 GB HBM2
Mem. Speed
870 GB/s
FP32 Compute
14.8 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+967% Memory Bus (4096-bit vs 384-bit)
+39% Bandwidth (870 GB/s vs 624 GB/s)
+11% CUDA Cores (5,120 vs 4,608)
NVIDIA
Quadro RTX 8000
Price
€4,385
VRAM
48 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
624 GB/s
FP32 Compute
14.9 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+1% FP32 (TFLOPS) (14.9 TFLOPS vs 14.8 TFLOPS)

Quadro GV100 vs Quadro RTX 8000: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: Quadro GV100 vs Quadro RTX 8000

The Quadro RTX 8000 carries 48GB of VRAM versus 32GB on the Quadro GV100. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 16GB advantage here means the Quadro RTX 8000 can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The Quadro GV100 delivers 870 GB/s versus 624 GB/s on the Quadro RTX 8000, a 39% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the Quadro GV100 will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The Quadro RTX 8000 delivers 14.9 TFLOPS against 14.8 TFLOPS for the Quadro GV100 — a 1% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the Quadro RTX 8000.

Price & Value

The Quadro RTX 8000 lists from $4,385 EUR, $7,215 EUR less than the Quadro GV100 at $11,600 EUR. For budget-constrained teams, the savings may outweigh the spec gap — especially if the smaller card covers your typical workload.

Which should you buy: Quadro GV100 or Quadro RTX 8000?

These cards suit different priorities. Choose the Quadro RTX 8000 if fitting larger models in VRAM is your constraint. Choose the Quadro GV100 if your models already fit and you want faster inference throughput from its higher memory bandwidth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Quadro GV100 or Quadro RTX 8000 run large language models?

Both can, but the Quadro RTX 8000 (48GB) handles larger models without quantization. The Quadro GV100 (32GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the Quadro GV100 or the Quadro RTX 8000?

The Quadro GV100 is faster for token generation — its 870 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 624 GB/s on the Quadro RTX 8000 is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The Quadro RTX 8000 has the advantage at 14.9 TFLOPS vs 14.8 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the Quadro GV100.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationQuadro GV100Quadro RTX 8000
ArchitectureVoltaTuring
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / CUDA Cores)5,1204,608

Memory

SpecificationQuadro GV100Quadro RTX 8000
VRAM Capacity32 GB48 GB
Memory TypeHBM2GDDR6
Memory Bus4096-bit384-bit
Bandwidth870 GB/s624 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationQuadro GV100Quadro RTX 8000
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
TDP250 W295 W
ReleasedMar 2018Oct 2018

Workstation

SpecificationQuadro GV100Quadro RTX 8000
FP32 (TFLOPS)14.8 TFLOPS14.9 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkYesYes
Form factordual-slotdual-slot