GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Quick Verdict

On raw speed the Radeon RX 6950 XT comes out significantly faster — about 20% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3080. But the GeForce RTX 3080 is the better value, undercutting it by $826 EUR for the performance you get.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 3080
Price
€720
Performance
35%
VRAM
10 GB GDDR6X
Key Specs Advantage
+70% CUDA Cores (8,704 vs 5,120)
+32% Bandwidth (760 GB/s vs 576 GB/s)
+25% Memory Bus (320-bit vs 256-bit)
Price
€1,546
Performance
42%
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Key Specs Advantage
+35% Boost Clock (2,310 MHz vs 1,710 MHz)
+18% Ray Accelerators (80 vs 68)

Radeon RX 6950 XT vs GeForce RTX 3080: In-Depth Breakdown

Performance: Radeon RX 6950 XT vs GeForce RTX 3080

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is significantly faster, around 20% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3080. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 6950 XT is comfortable at 4K with upscaling and native 1440p, while the GeForce RTX 3080 is better matched to 1440p.

Price & Value

The GeForce RTX 3080 currently lists from $720 EUR, $826 EUR less than the Radeon RX 6950 XT at $1,546 EUR. Despite being slower, the GeForce RTX 3080 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~79% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon RX 6950 XT still sits about $447 EUR above its $1,099 EUR MSRP.

VRAM & Future-Proofing

The Radeon RX 6950 XT carries 16GB versus 10GB on the GeForce RTX 3080. The extra 6GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.

Generation & Longevity

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is roughly 2 years newer than the GeForce RTX 3080 (RDNA 2 vs Ampere), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.

Features & Ecosystem

Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce RTX 3080 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.

Which should you buy: GeForce RTX 3080 or Radeon RX 6950 XT?

Choose the Radeon RX 6950 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce RTX 3080 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Radeon RX 6950 XT better than the GeForce RTX 3080?

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is significantly faster, roughly 20% ahead. The GeForce RTX 3080 is still worth it if value matters more than top-end frames.

Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce RTX 3080 or the Radeon RX 6950 XT?

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is the better 4K option — it's comfortable at 4K with upscaling and native 1440p, and its 16GB of VRAM helps with 4K textures.

Is the Radeon RX 6950 XT worth the extra $826 EUR over the GeForce RTX 3080?

Only if you need the extra performance or features; on pure value the GeForce RTX 3080 comes out ahead.

Does the Radeon RX 6950 XT have enough VRAM advantage to matter?

Its 16GB (vs 10GB) gives real headroom for 4K, heavy texture mods, and creative/AI work. At 1080p the gap matters less.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationGeForce RTX 3080Radeon RX 6950 XT
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2
Process NodeSamsung 8nmTSMC N7
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors)8,7045,120
Ray Tracing Cores6880
Tensor / AI Cores272

Clock Speeds

SpecificationGeForce RTX 3080Radeon RX 6950 XT
Base Clock1,440 MHz1,860 MHz
Boost Clock1,710 MHz2,310 MHz

Memory

SpecificationGeForce RTX 3080Radeon RX 6950 XT
VRAM Capacity10 GB16 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6XGDDR6
Memory Bus320-bit256-bit
Memory Speed19 Gbps18 Gbps
Bandwidth760 GB/s576 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationGeForce RTX 3080Radeon RX 6950 XT
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP320 W335 W
Power Connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin
ReleasedSep 2020May 2022