GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti comes out dramatically faster — about 150% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1660. But the GeForce GTX 1660 is the better value, undercutting it by $631 EUR for the performance you get.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1660: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is dramatically faster, around 150% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1660. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is comfortable at 1080p, while the GeForce GTX 1660 is better matched to entry-level 1080p. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti packs 4,352 CUDA cores versus 1,408 on the GeForce GTX 1660.
Price & Value
The GeForce GTX 1660 currently lists from $230 EUR, $631 EUR less than the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at $861 EUR. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1660 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~50% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is trading below its $999 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
On power, the GeForce GTX 1660 is the gentler choice at 120W versus 250W. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is more efficient per watt because it's faster, but its higher 250W draw means more heat and a bigger PSU.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti carries 11GB versus 6GB on the GeForce GTX 1660. The extra 5GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers. The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's memory is also faster — 616 GB/s versus 192 GB/s (352-bit vs 192-bit bus) — which helps feed the GPU at 4K and with heavy textures.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1660 or GeForce RTX 2080 Ti?
Choose the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1660 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.