GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The GeForce GTX 1650 is noticeably faster than the Arc A380, leading by roughly 17% in our performance index. The Arc A380, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $41 EUR cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A380: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A380
The GeForce GTX 1650 is noticeably faster, around 17% ahead of the Arc A380. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Arc A380 starts at $159 EUR against $200 EUR for the GeForce GTX 1650. Despite being slower, the Arc A380 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~8% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 6GB against 4GB, the Arc A380 has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 1650's 4GB can fall short.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A380 is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1650 (Alchemist vs Turing), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A380 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce GTX 1650 offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A380 or GeForce GTX 1650?
Choose the GeForce GTX 1650 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A380 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.