GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the Arc A750 comes out dramatically faster — about 350% ahead of the Arc A310. It also wins on performance-per-dollar, making it the cleaner choice when you can afford it.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Arc A750 vs Arc A310: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Arc A750 vs Arc A310
The Arc A750 is dramatically faster, around 350% ahead of the Arc A310. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Arc A750 is comfortable at 1080p, while the Arc A310 is better matched to entry-level 1080p. The Arc A750 packs 3,584 shading units versus 768 on the Arc A310. The Arc A750 also has more RT cores (28 vs 6) and more AI cores (448 vs 96), strengthening its ray-tracing and AI-upscaling performance.
Price & Value
The Arc A750 currently lists from $58 EUR, $80 EUR less than the Arc A310 at $137 EUR. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Arc A750 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 973%. The Arc A750 is trading below its $289 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
At 30W against 225W, the Arc A310 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Arc A750 carries 8GB versus 4GB on the Arc A310. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers. The Arc A750's memory is also faster — 512 GB/s versus 124 GB/s (256-bit vs 64-bit bus) — which helps feed the GPU at 4K and with heavy textures.
Which should you buy: Arc A310 or Arc A750?
The Arc A750 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the Arc A310 if you find it at a steep discount.