GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
Market comparison is currently pending while we verify the latest benchmarks for GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon RX Vega 56.
On raw speed the Radeon RX Vega 56 comes out significantly faster — about 33% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. It also wins on performance-per-dollar, making it the cleaner choice when you can afford it.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is significantly faster, around 33% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER currently lists from $84,624 JPY, $5,452 JPY less than the Radeon RX Vega 56 at $90,076 JPY. Because it's both faster and competitively priced, the Radeon RX Vega 56 wins on performance-per-dollar by about 25%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still sits about $84,465 JPY above its $159 JPY MSRP. The Radeon RX Vega 56 still sits about $89,677 JPY above its $399 JPY MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 100W against 210W, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon RX Vega 56 carries 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 56 (Turing vs GCN 5.0 (Vega)), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX Vega 56?
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the all-round winner here — it's faster and the better value, so buy it if it fits your budget. Only consider the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER if you find it at a steep discount.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon RX Vega 56 better than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or the Radeon RX Vega 56?
Is the Radeon RX Vega 56 worth the extra $5,452 JPY over the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Does the Radeon RX Vega 56 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 (Vega) |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | GloFo 14nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 1,280 | 3,584✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,530 MHz✓ | 1,156 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,725 MHz✓ | 1,471 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 2048-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 12 Gbps✓ | 1.6 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 409.6 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 100 W✓ | 210 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Nov 2019 | Aug 2017 |