GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
Market Value Leader
Market comparison is currently pending while we verify the latest benchmarks for Arc A380 and GeForce GTX 1650.
The GeForce GTX 1650 is noticeably faster than the Arc A380, leading by roughly 17% in our performance index. The Arc A380, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $18,802 JPY cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A380: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A380
The GeForce GTX 1650 is noticeably faster, around 17% ahead of the Arc A380. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the Arc A380 starts at $28,512 JPY against $47,314 JPY for the GeForce GTX 1650. Despite being slower, the Arc A380 offers the better performance-per-dollar (~42% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Arc A380 still sits about $28,373 JPY above its $139 JPY MSRP. The GeForce GTX 1650 still sits about $47,165 JPY above its $149 JPY MSRP.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 6GB against 4GB, the Arc A380 has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 1650's 4GB can fall short.
Generation & Longevity
The Arc A380 is roughly 3 years newer than the GeForce GTX 1650 (Alchemist vs Turing), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Arc A380 brings Intel XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding, while the GeForce GTX 1650 offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Arc A380 or GeForce GTX 1650?
Choose the GeForce GTX 1650 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Arc A380 stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce GTX 1650 better than the Arc A380?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the Arc A380 or the GeForce GTX 1650?
Is the GeForce GTX 1650 worth the extra $18,802 JPY over the Arc A380?
Does the Arc A380 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Alchemist | Turing |
| Process Node | TSMC N6 | TSMC 12nm |
| CUDA Cores (Shading Units / CUDA Cores) | 1,024✓ | 896 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | — |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 128 | — |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2,000 MHz✓ | 1,485 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2,450 MHz✓ | 1,665 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB✓ | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 96-bit | 128-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 15.5 Gbps✓ | 8 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 186 GB/s✓ | 128 GB/s |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 75 W | 75 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Released | Jun 2022 | Apr 2019 |