Skip to content

Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon PRO W5700

Workstation Verdict

With 16GB on board versus 8GB for the Radeon PRO W5700, the Quadro RTX 5000 carries more headroom for large models and memory-hungry workloads. Price-wise, the Radeon PRO W5700 undercuts the Quadro RTX 5000 by $211 EUR.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
Price
€690
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
448 GB/s
FP32 Compute
11.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+33% CUDA Cores (3,072 vs 2,304)
+32% FP32 (TFLOPS) (11.2 TFLOPS vs 8.5 TFLOPS)
AMD Radeon
PRO W5700
Price
€479
VRAM
8 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
448 GB/s
FP32 Compute
8.5 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage

Comparable or lower specs

Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon PRO W5700: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon PRO W5700

With 16GB of VRAM against the Radeon PRO W5700's 8GB, the Quadro RTX 5000 has a 8GB edge. VRAM is what determines whether a model fits without quantization at all — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 needs around 140GB, and smaller models still benefit from spare capacity. That extra headroom lets the Quadro RTX 5000 load bigger models and run larger production batch sizes.

AI Training & Compute

FP32 throughput is the metric that matters most for training, scientific simulation, and rendering work. The Quadro RTX 5000 posts 11.2 TFLOPS versus 8.5 TFLOPS on the Radeon PRO W5700, a 32% compute lead. Expect training jobs and heavy matrix math to finish proportionally sooner on the Quadro RTX 5000.

Price & Value

The Radeon PRO W5700 lists from $479 EUR, $211 EUR less than the Quadro RTX 5000 at $690 EUR. For budget-constrained teams, the savings may outweigh the spec gap — especially if the smaller card covers your typical workload.

Which should you buy: Quadro RTX 5000 or Radeon PRO W5700?

Go with the Quadro RTX 5000 if you need maximum capacity: it's ahead on VRAM, bandwidth, and compute, so it's the stronger fit for large models and training jobs. The Radeon PRO W5700 is the cheaper pick ($211 EUR less) — worth it if your models already fit within its 8GB and you're not running heavy inference volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Quadro RTX 5000 or Radeon PRO W5700 run large language models?

Both can, but the Quadro RTX 5000 (16GB) handles larger models without quantization. The Radeon PRO W5700 (8GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is better for AI training?

The Quadro RTX 5000 has the advantage at 11.2 TFLOPS vs 8.5 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the Radeon PRO W5700.

Which should you buy: Quadro RTX 5000 or Radeon PRO W5700?

Go with the Quadro RTX 5000 if you need maximum capacity: it's ahead on VRAM, bandwidth, and compute, so it's the stronger fit for large models and training jobs. The Radeon PRO W5700 is the cheaper pick ($211 EUR less) — worth it if your models already fit within its 8GB and you're not running heavy inference volume.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

Architecture & Cores specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon PRO W5700
SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000Radeon PRO W5700
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 1
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors)3,0722,304

Memory

Memory specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon PRO W5700
SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000Radeon PRO W5700
VRAM Capacity16 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus256-bit256-bit
Bandwidth448 GB/s448 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

Connectivity & Power specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon PRO W5700
SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000Radeon PRO W5700
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP230 W130 W
ReleasedOct 2018Dec 2019

Workstation

Workstation specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon PRO W5700
SpecificationQuadro RTX 5000Radeon PRO W5700
FP32 (TFLOPS)11.2 TFLOPS8.5 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoNo
Form factordual-slotdual-slot