Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 5000
With 16GB on board versus 6GB for the Quadro RTX 3000, the Quadro RTX 5000 carries more headroom for large models and memory-hungry workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 33% higher (448 GB/s vs 336 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput. Price-wise, the Quadro RTX 5000 undercuts the Quadro RTX 3000 by $258 EUR.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Comparable or lower specs
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 5000: In-Depth Breakdown
VRAM: Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 5000
With 16GB of VRAM against the Quadro RTX 3000's 6GB, the Quadro RTX 5000 has a 10GB edge. VRAM is what determines whether a model fits without quantization at all — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 needs around 140GB, and smaller models still benefit from spare capacity. That extra headroom lets the Quadro RTX 5000 load bigger models and run larger production batch sizes.
Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth
Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The Quadro RTX 5000 delivers 448 GB/s versus 336 GB/s on the Quadro RTX 3000, a 33% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the Quadro RTX 5000 will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.
AI Training & Compute
FP32 throughput is the metric that matters most for training, scientific simulation, and rendering work. The Quadro RTX 5000 posts 11.2 TFLOPS versus 5.3 TFLOPS on the Quadro RTX 3000, a 111% compute lead. Expect training jobs and heavy matrix math to finish proportionally sooner on the Quadro RTX 5000.
Price & Value
The Quadro RTX 5000 lists from $691 EUR, $258 EUR less than the Quadro RTX 3000 at $949 EUR. For budget-constrained teams, the savings may outweigh the spec gap — especially if the smaller card covers your typical workload.
Which should you buy: Quadro RTX 3000 or Quadro RTX 5000?
For large-model workloads bottlenecked on VRAM, the Quadro RTX 5000 is the better pick. The Quadro RTX 3000 costs less ($258 EUR cheaper) and holds up fine if your models fit inside its 6GB.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the Quadro RTX 3000 or Quadro RTX 5000 run large language models?
Which is faster for LLM inference, the Quadro RTX 3000 or the Quadro RTX 5000?
Which is better for AI training?
Which should you buy: Quadro RTX 3000 or Quadro RTX 5000?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | Quadro RTX 3000 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / CUDA Cores) | 1,920 | 3,072✓ |
Memory
| Specification | Quadro RTX 3000 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 192-bit | 256-bit✓ |
| Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | Quadro RTX 3000 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 160 W✓ | 230 W |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Oct 2018 |
Workstation
| Specification | Quadro RTX 3000 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| FP32 (TFLOPS) | 5.3 TFLOPS | 11.2 TFLOPS✓ |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| NVLink | No | No |
| Form factor | single-slot | dual-slot |