GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390X
On raw speed the GeForce GTX 1650 comes out dramatically faster — about 40% ahead of the Radeon R9 390X. But the Radeon R9 390X is the better value, undercutting it by $231 EUR for the performance you get.
Market Value Leader
Radeon R9 390X is the clear winner, offering 132.2% better value than GeForce GTX 1650.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390X: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390X
The GeForce GTX 1650 is dramatically faster, around 40% ahead of the Radeon R9 390X. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The Radeon R9 390X currently lists from $103 EUR, $231 EUR less than the GeForce GTX 1650 at $334 EUR. Despite being slower, the Radeon R9 390X offers the better performance-per-dollar (~132% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon R9 390X is trading below its $429 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal. The GeForce GTX 1650 still sits about $185 EUR above its $149 EUR MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 75W against 275W, the GeForce GTX 1650 is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon R9 390X carries 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650. The extra 4GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 is roughly 4 years newer than the Radeon R9 390X (Turing vs GCN 2.0), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon R9 390X offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon R9 390X?
Choose the GeForce GTX 1650 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the Radeon R9 390X stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GeForce GTX 1650 better than the Radeon R9 390X?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 or the Radeon R9 390X?
Is the GeForce GTX 1650 worth the extra $231 EUR over the Radeon R9 390X?
Does the Radeon R9 390X have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon R9 390X?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | TSMC 28nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 896 | 2,816✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,485 MHz✓ | 1,050 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,665 MHz✓ | 1,050 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 512-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 8 Gbps✓ | 6 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 384 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 75 W✓ | 275 W |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Released | Apr 2019 | Jun 2015 |