GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, leading by roughly 344% in our performance index. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $786 EUR cheaper.
Market Value Leader
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the clear winner, offering 471.6% better value than Radeon RX 6900 XT.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Comparable or lower specs
Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is dramatically faster, around 344% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 6900 XT is comfortable at 1440p, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER starts at $32 EUR against $818 EUR for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers the better performance-per-dollar (~472% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is trading below its $159 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is trading below its $999 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER pulls less power (100W vs 300W), so it's the easier card to cool and the lighter load on your PSU. The faster Radeon RX 6900 XT draws more overall but extracts more performance from each watt — plan for a sturdier power supply if you pick it. Its more modern RDNA 2 architecture on a TSMC N7 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
With 16GB against 4GB, the Radeon RX 6900 XT has more headroom for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative/AI tasks where the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 4GB can fall short.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Choose the Radeon RX 6900 XT if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT better than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or the Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Is the Radeon RX 6900 XT worth the extra $786 EUR over the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Does the Radeon RX 6900 XT have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | TSMC N7 |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 1,280 | 5,120✓ |
| Ray Tracing Cores | — | 80 |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,530 MHz | 1,825 MHz✓ |
| Boost Clock | 1,725 MHz | 2,250 MHz✓ |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 256-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 12 Gbps | 16 Gbps✓ |
| Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TDP | 100 W✓ | 300 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Nov 2019 | Dec 2020 |