Skip to content

Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 4000

Workstation Verdict

The Quadro RTX 4000 has more VRAM (8GB vs 6GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Memory bandwidth runs 24% ahead (416 GB/s versus 336 GB/s), which feeds straight through into quicker inference.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
Price
Reference GPU
VRAM
6 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
336 GB/s
FP32 Compute
5.3 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage

Comparable or lower specs

Price
€587
VRAM
8 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
416 GB/s
FP32 Compute
7.1 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+34% FP32 (TFLOPS) (7.1 TFLOPS vs 5.3 TFLOPS)
+33% Memory Bus (256-bit vs 192-bit)
+24% Bandwidth (416 GB/s vs 336 GB/s)

Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 4000: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 carries 8GB of VRAM versus 6GB on the Quadro RTX 3000. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 2GB advantage here means the Quadro RTX 4000 can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

The rate data moves to the compute units — memory bandwidth — is what caps autoregressive inference speed (token generation in LLMs). Here the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 416 GB/s against 336 GB/s for the Quadro RTX 3000, a 24% advantage. Once a model is resident in VRAM, token throughput tracks this figure closely, so the Quadro RTX 4000 generates tokens proportionally faster on bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The Quadro RTX 4000 delivers 7.1 TFLOPS against 5.3 TFLOPS for the Quadro RTX 3000 — a 34% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the Quadro RTX 4000.

Which should you buy: Quadro RTX 3000 or Quadro RTX 4000?

The Quadro RTX 4000 is the stronger choice for large-model workloads where VRAM is the bottleneck. The Quadro RTX 3000 is more economical, and sufficient if your models fit within its 6GB.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Quadro RTX 3000 or Quadro RTX 4000 run large language models?

Yes, both are capable, though the Quadro RTX 4000 (8GB) can handle bigger models without needing quantization. The Quadro RTX 3000 (6GB) is better suited to smaller or more heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the Quadro RTX 3000 or the Quadro RTX 4000?

The Quadro RTX 4000 is faster for token generation — its 416 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 336 GB/s on the Quadro RTX 3000 is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The Quadro RTX 4000 leads at 7.1 TFLOPS versus 5.3 TFLOPS, so training runs finish proportionally sooner than on the Quadro RTX 3000.

Which should you buy: Quadro RTX 3000 or Quadro RTX 4000?

The Quadro RTX 4000 is the stronger choice for large-model workloads where VRAM is the bottleneck. The Quadro RTX 3000 is more economical, and sufficient if your models fit within its 6GB.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

Architecture & Cores specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 3000 and Quadro RTX 4000
SpecificationQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 4000
ArchitectureTuringTuring
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / CUDA Cores)1,9202,304

Memory

Memory specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 3000 and Quadro RTX 4000
SpecificationQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 4000
VRAM Capacity6 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus192-bit256-bit
Bandwidth336 GB/s416 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

Connectivity & Power specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 3000 and Quadro RTX 4000
SpecificationQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 4000
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
TDP160 W160 W
ReleasedApr 2019Oct 2018

Workstation

Workstation specifications comparison between Quadro RTX 3000 and Quadro RTX 4000
SpecificationQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 4000
FP32 (TFLOPS)5.3 TFLOPS7.1 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoNo
Form factorsingle-slotsingle-slot