GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX Vega 56
On raw speed the Radeon RX Vega 56 comes out ahead: well ahead on speed, about 33% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. That said, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the smarter buy on value — $869 EUR less for the performance on offer.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is significantly faster, around 33% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Both cards sit in the same broad class, well suited to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER currently lists from $251 EUR, $869 EUR less than the Radeon RX Vega 56 at $1,120 EUR. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers the better performance-per-dollar (~235% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still sits about $92 EUR above its $159 EUR MSRP. The Radeon RX Vega 56 still sits about $721 EUR above its $399 EUR MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
At 100W against 210W, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
VRAM favors the Radeon RX Vega 56 at 8GB versus 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — that extra 4GB matters most at 4K, with high-res texture packs, and for content-creation/local-AI work.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 56 (Turing vs GCN 5.0 (Vega)), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX Vega 56?
Choose the Radeon RX Vega 56 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon RX Vega 56 better than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or the Radeon RX Vega 56?
Is the Radeon RX Vega 56 worth the extra $869 EUR over the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Does the Radeon RX Vega 56 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX Vega 56?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 (Vega) |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | GloFo 14nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 1,280 | 3,584✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,530 MHz✓ | 1,156 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,725 MHz✓ | 1,471 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 2048-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 12 Gbps✓ | 1.6 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 409.6 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 100 W✓ | 210 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Nov 2019 | Aug 2017 |