GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX Vega 64
Performance-wise the Radeon RX Vega 64 is out front, dramatically faster, roughly 56% up on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Value tips toward the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, though: $2,934 EUR cheaper for what you get.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is dramatically faster, around 56% ahead of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX Vega 64 is comfortable at 1080p, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER starts at $213 EUR against $3,147 EUR for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Despite being slower, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers the better performance-per-dollar (~852% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The Radeon RX Vega 64 still sits about $2,648 EUR above its $499 EUR MSRP.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER sips power at 100W next to the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W, and still leads on performance-per-watt — quieter, cooler, and gentler on your PSU. Its more modern Turing architecture on a TSMC 12nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon RX Vega 64's 8GB (vs 4GB on the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) gives it more room for 4K textures and memory-hungry creative or AI workloads.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is roughly 2 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 64 (Turing vs GCN 5.0 (Vega)), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX Vega 64?
Choose the Radeon RX Vega 64 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Radeon RX Vega 64 better than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which is better for 4K gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or the Radeon RX Vega 64?
Is the Radeon RX Vega 64 worth the extra $2,934 EUR over the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Does the Radeon RX Vega 64 have enough VRAM advantage to matter?
Which should you buy: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon RX Vega 64?
Technical Specifications Comparison
Architecture & Cores
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 (Vega) |
| Process Node | TSMC 12nm | GloFo 14nm |
| CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / Stream Processors) | 1,280 | 4,096✓ |
Clock Speeds
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 1,530 MHz✓ | 1,247 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1,725 MHz✓ | 1,546 MHz |
Memory
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB✓ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit | 2048-bit✓ |
| Memory Speed | 12 Gbps✓ | 1.89 Gbps |
| Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s✓ |
Connectivity & Power
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TDP | 100 W✓ | 295 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Released | Nov 2019 | Aug 2017 |