GPU Comparison

Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.

Workstation Verdict

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has more VRAM (20GB vs 16GB), making it better suited for large models and memory-intensive workloads. Its memory bandwidth is 25% higher (280 GB/s vs 224 GB/s), translating directly to faster inference throughput.

Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)

VS
NVIDIA
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Price
€762
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
224 GB/s
FP32 Compute
12 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage

Comparable or lower specs

Price
Awaiting Data
VRAM
20 GB GDDR6
Mem. Speed
280 GB/s
FP32 Compute
19.2 TFLOPS
Key Specs Advantage
+118% CUDA Cores (6,144 vs 2,816)
+60% FP32 (TFLOPS) (19.2 TFLOPS vs 12 TFLOPS)
+25% Bandwidth (280 GB/s vs 224 GB/s)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation: In-Depth Breakdown

VRAM: RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation carries 20GB of VRAM versus 16GB on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. VRAM capacity is the primary constraint for running AI models without quantization — a 70B-parameter model in FP16 requires roughly 140GB, and even smaller models benefit from extra headroom. The 4GB advantage here means the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation can run larger models natively and handle bigger batch sizes in production.

Inference Speed: Memory Bandwidth

Memory bandwidth determines how quickly data is fed to the compute units — it's the main bottleneck for autoregressive inference (token generation in LLMs). The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation delivers 280 GB/s versus 224 GB/s on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation, a 25% edge. For models already loaded into VRAM, token generation speed scales closely with this number: the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation will produce tokens proportionally faster in bandwidth-bound workloads.

AI Training & Compute

For model training, scientific simulation, and rendering, FP32 throughput is the key metric. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation delivers 19.2 TFLOPS against 12 TFLOPS for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation — a 60% compute advantage. Training runs and heavy matrix operations will complete proportionally faster on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.

Which should you buy: RTX 2000 Ada Generation or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the stronger choice for large-model workloads where VRAM is the bottleneck. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more economical, and sufficient if your models fit within its 16GB.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the RTX 2000 Ada Generation or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation run large language models?

Both can, but the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (20GB) handles larger models without quantization. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation (16GB) works well for smaller or heavily quantized models.

Which is faster for LLM inference, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation or the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is faster for token generation — its 280 GB/s memory bandwidth vs 224 GB/s on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the primary driver of inference throughput in autoregressive models.

Which is better for AI training?

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has the advantage at 19.2 TFLOPS vs 12 TFLOPS, making training runs proportionally faster than on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Technical Specifications Comparison

Architecture & Cores

SpecificationRTX 2000 Ada GenerationRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
CUDA Cores (CUDA Cores / CUDA Cores)2,8166,144

Memory

SpecificationRTX 2000 Ada GenerationRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity16 GB20 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bus128-bit160-bit
Bandwidth224 GB/s280 GB/s

Connectivity & Power

SpecificationRTX 2000 Ada GenerationRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
TDP70 W70 W
ReleasedMar 2023Feb 2023

Workstation

SpecificationRTX 2000 Ada GenerationRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
FP32 (TFLOPS)12 TFLOPS19.2 TFLOPS
ECCYesYes
NVLinkNoNo
Form factorlow-profilelow-profile