GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
The Radeon RX 7600 is dramatically faster than the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB, leading by roughly 82% in our performance index. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB, however, delivers more performance per dollar — $258 EUR cheaper.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The Radeon RX 7600 is dramatically faster, around 82% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX 7600 is comfortable at 1080p, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Price & Value
Right now the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB starts at $23 EUR against $281 EUR for the Radeon RX 7600. Despite being slower, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers the better performance-per-dollar (~573% better value), so budget-focused buyers should weigh it carefully. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is trading below its $249 EUR MSRP — a genuine deal.
Power & Efficiency
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB pulls less power (130W vs 165W), so it's the easier card to cool and the lighter load on your PSU. The faster Radeon RX 7600 draws more overall but extracts more performance from each watt — plan for a sturdier power supply if you pick it. Its more modern RDNA 3 architecture on a TSMC N6 process is part of why it does more with each watt.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB brings NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing, while the Radeon RX 7600 offers AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: GeForce RTX 3050 8GB or Radeon RX 7600?
Choose the Radeon RX 7600 if you want the most performance and can absorb the higher price. If you're optimizing for value, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB stretches your money further for only slightly lower performance.