GPU Comparison
Select up to 2 GPUs to analyze their pricing, performance, and specifications side-by-side.
On raw speed the Radeon RX Vega 64 comes out noticeably faster — about 15% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.
Maximum Capacity Reached. Remove a model to add another. (2/2)
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: In-Depth Breakdown
Performance: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is noticeably faster, around 15% ahead of the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. That gap is enough to move it up a tier: the Radeon RX Vega 64 is comfortable at 1080p, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is better matched to entry-level 1080p.
Power & Efficiency
At 130W against 295W, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is both the lower-power and the more efficient card, making it the easier build to cool and power. Its more modern Ampere architecture on a Samsung 8nm process is part of why it does more with each watt.
VRAM & Future-Proofing
The Radeon RX Vega 64 carries 8GB versus 6GB on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. The extra 2GB helps at 4K, with high-resolution texture packs, and for content-creation or local-AI workloads that exhaust smaller buffers.
Generation & Longevity
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is roughly 5 years newer than the Radeon RX Vega 64 (Ampere vs GCN 5.0 (Vega)), so it generally benefits from a more modern architecture and longer driver-support runway.
Features & Ecosystem
Beyond raw numbers, the Radeon RX Vega 64 brings AMD FSR upscaling and strong rasterization value, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers NVIDIA DLSS upscaling/frame generation and stronger ray tracing. If you lean on upscaling or ray tracing, that ecosystem difference can matter as much as the frame-rate gap.
Which should you buy: Radeon RX Vega 64 or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is the faster card by about 15%. With live pricing limited for this pair, base your decision on the spec differences above — particularly VRAM and power draw — and check current stock before buying.